One Case Resolved, on the Face of it
Justice is a slippery concept, almost at hand one moment then suddenly out of reach. As soon as you think you have it worked out a new aspect eludes you, squirting like a soap bar from your grasping hand. But there are other moments, a few minutes of grace when the legal system finally works the way social expectations direct it. At these times, even a small measure of justice is enough to move someone on to a new beginning, to shift their troubles from the bitterness of immediate experience to the sweet release of memory. Today in Hong Kong’s Labour Tribunal, things went pretty much that way.
I mentioned recently that in leaving behind the disappointment of Vicky Flores’ inquest those who had worked so hard for justice to be done needed to refocus on other tasks at hand. To move on in disappointment is to learn about assessing one task in relation to another, to gain perspective. So I helped to rewrite the statement of a woman who had been brought to Hong Kong as a domestic helper, employed for a month and then pushed out the door into compulsory illegal employment with someone else.
Welcome to Asia self-described ‘World-City’.
The employer claimed that the woman needed extra ‘training’ from the employment agent, who just so happened to be her sister-in-law. So the scam played out, and another helper was hired for a month. You can probably see where this is going, and it’s not hard to imagine that it had been a successful little operation until someone had the courage, and sufficient desperation, to stand against the process, to simply say no. For her trouble, our friend received no wages for the time worked, no severance pay as prescribed under Hong Kong Law, and no ticket back to the Philippines – a condition of her contract. In the eyes of the employer, she was a runaway.